Notes on the body w/o organs

#1 Making a Body without Organs

04.01.2003 Antonin Artaud

1 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsThe body without organs first appeared in Deleuze’s (1990) The Logic of Sense, then in Deleuze and Guattari’s (1984) Anti-Oedipus and then in Deleuze and Guattari’s (1988) A Thousand Plateaus. The term was first coined by Antonin Artaud in the 1940s, and Deleuze and Guattari (1988: 150) [...]

Read More →

#2 Anti-Oedipus: Full Empty

04.02.2003 Antonin Artaud

2 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsWhat is a body without organs? D&G say that the BwO is full—full in the sense that it is a blank surface without the interconnected functions or parts that organs would be. It is full precisely because it lacks any depth or differentiation. D&G claim that [...]

Read More →

#3 Anti-Oedipus: Emptiness as Resistance

04.03.2003 Antonin Artaud

3 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsBut how can something be full, when it is emptied out? “The mad state is, as he emphasizes over and over again, empty. Teeming with emptiness. Knotted with emptiness. Immodest in its emptiness. You can pull emptiness out of it by the handful. “I am not [...]

Read More →

#4 Anti-Oedipus: paranoid machine

04.04.2003 Antonin Artaud

4 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsGive me an example of a BwO: “eyes closed tight, nostrils pinched shut, ears stopped up” (pp. 37-38). Why is the BwO closed off? D&G define the BwO as a paranoid machine: a machine of primary repression. This paranoiac is hypersensitive, it suffers from desiring-machines, and [...]

Read More →

#5 Anti-Oedipus: BwO

04.05.2003 Antonin Artaud

5 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsWhat is a desiring machine? For D&G, there is no such thing as desire, only desiring-machines. It’s not a thing, but a process. Roland Bogue describes desiring machines by way of an infant feeding a the mother’s breast. Here the “mouth-machine” of the infant and the “breast [...]

Read More →

#6 Anti-Oedipus: BwO

04.06.2003 Antonin Artaud

6 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsIf a BwO doesn’t produce anything, how does it function? The two aspects of the BwO that most interest D&G are its function of recording and its apparent miraculous form, that is, the appearance of miracles. “The body without organs, the unproductive, the unconsumable, serves as [...]

Read More →

#7 Anti-Oedipus: BwO

04.07.2003 Antonin Artaud

7 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsCapital is a body without organs of the capitalist (or the capitalist being), and labor is a productive machine. Recording: Capital is thus the unproductive surface on which the production of labor is recorded. “Recording” means that the value of labor/production is determined on capital. For [...]

Read More →

#8 Anti-Oedipus: BwO

03.08.2003 Antonin Artaud

8 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsDesire and subjectivity? Where did you go? Is the BwO a real body or some sort of metaphor for capitalism? Well, D&G don’t really beleive in metaphor. No representation. No modeling or mini. For D&G, we are always “becoming.” So, in essense, we become capital and [...]

Read More →

#9 Anti-Oedipus: BwO

04.09.2003 Antonin Artaud

9 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsSo the celibate machine is a good thing? Well, sort of. Again. D&G don’t exactly like the categories of good and bad. But they do explicitly describe the residuum of the celibate machine as positive. A celibate machine takes on all kinds of different desiring-machines (thinking that [...]

Read More →

#10 A Thousand Plateaus: BwO

04.10.2003 Antonin Artaud

10 of 13 in Notes on the body w/o organsIn A Thousand Plateaus (ATP), the BwO is depicted as productive – independent of goal-directed workings of the capitalist political economy, and irreducible to the Freudian mommy-daddy-me triangle. Invoking the BwO, D&G offer a different way of thinking about the body that contrasts with the notion [...]

Read More →